The previous "layout mismatch" deferral was a one-line bench bug: NEON expects the caller to pass tmp pointing at the 8x8 block origin (after the 2*16+2 padding skip), but the bench passed the raw padded-buffer origin. C ref does the advance internally, so it filtered the correct block; NEON filtered a (+2 rows, +2 cols) shifted region. Diagonal-shift trace in the partial doc was exactly that. Fix: tmps + i*TMP_INTS + (2*TMP_W + 2) for NEON calls. Results: M1: 10000/10000 bit-exact (100.0000%), all 8 dirs balanced M3: 3.809 Mblock/s (consistent with 3.923 from longer window) Phase 4 unblocked; predicted R5 = 0.02-0.05 (deep RED) per earlier analysis. Will build QPU CDEF anyway for cycle-completeness + V4L2 dispatch-path existence. - tests/bench_neon_cdef.c: 3-line tmp pointer fix - docs/k5_cdef_phase3.md: supersedes k5_cdef_phase3_partial.md Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
4.3 KiB
cycle, phase, status, date_opened, date_closed, parent, host
| cycle | phase | status | date_opened | date_closed | parent | host |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | 3 | closed 2026-05-18 — M1 PASS, M3 captured | 2026-05-18 | 2026-05-18 | k5_cdef_phase1_2.md | hertz |
Cycle 5, Phase 3 — CDEF NEON baseline (closed)
Supersedes k5_cdef_phase3_partial.md. The M1 deferral from the
partial doc resolved as a one-line bench bug, not a layout
ambiguity in dav1d's NEON.
Root cause of the previous "layout mismatch"
tests/cdef_ref.c line 104 internally advances tmp += 2*16+2
(skips the padding region) before reading block data. dav1d_cdef_ filter8_8bpc_neon expects the caller to pass that already-advanced
pointer (i.e., pointer to the 8×8 block origin, not the padded
buffer origin). The bench was passing the raw padded-buffer pointer
to NEON, so NEON filtered a block shifted (+2 rows, +2 cols) from
where the C ref filtered. The "same 6 bytes at a different position"
trace in the partial doc is exactly that diagonal shift.
Fix: tmps + i*TMP_INTS + (2 * TMP_W + 2) for the NEON call.
Three-line patch in tests/bench_neon_cdef.c.
M1₅ bit-exact gate
=== M1₅_c bit-exact (10000 random 8x8 blocks) ===
M1₅_c correctness: 10000 / 10000 blocks bit-exact (100.0000%)
dir coverage: min=1194 max=1332 (8 directions sampled)
All 8 directions exercised, distribution flat. M1 gate PASS.
M3₅ NEON throughput
=== M3₅ NEON throughput ===
blocks/batch: 4096
batches done: 1801
total blocks: 7 376 896
elapsed (kernel)=1.937 s
throughput = 3.809 Mblock/s
per-block = 262.5 ns
equiv 1080p = 117.6 FPS (32 400 blocks/frame)
Consistent with the previously captured 3.923 Mblock/s (longer window). Per-block ~260 ns. CDEF remains the most compute- intensive kernel cycle so far (2.1× IDCT, 13× LPF wd=4, 5.5× MC).
| per-block ns | relative | |
|---|---|---|
| IDCT 8×8 (k1) | 122 | 1.0× |
| LPF wd=4 (k2) | 20.7 | 0.17× |
| MC 8h (k3) | 47.6 | 0.39× |
| LPF wd=8 (k4) | 19.1 | 0.16× |
| CDEF (k5) | 262.5 | 2.15× |
30fps@1080p floor margin: 3.9× isolation NEON single-core. NEON-4 baseline would be ~12-15 Mblock/s → 12-15× margin.
Methodology lessons
-
Inverted-bench bugs look like layout mismatches. The original diagnosis ("dav1d's NEON expects tmp built by a specific
dav1d_cdef_padding8_8bpc_neonroutine") was wrong; the filter accepts any uint16 tmp content (the pri+sec algorithm doesn't care if the halo is padded with sentinels or random pixels, as long as the constrain() math gets passed). The issue was which 8×8 region NEON would filter, not the semantics of the halo. -
Two pointer conventions for the same buffer: the C ref does "internal advance" (caller passes padded-buffer origin), the NEON does "external advance" (caller passes block origin). Trace evidence (a diagonal shift in the output) is diagnostic of pointer-convention mismatch.
-
dav1d_cdef_padding8_8bpc_neon is for sentinel-padded edge cases (when the block is at the picture boundary). For a middle-of-picture block where all neighbours exist, the NEON filter is happy to read raw pixel values; the constrain() math naturally handles any halo content.
What lands in this commit
tests/bench_neon_cdef.c: 3-line fix (tmp+34 for NEON calls)docs/k5_cdef_phase3.md(this doc) supersedesk5_cdef_phase3_partial.md
Phase 4 unblocked
Predicted R₅ (from k5_cdef_phase3_partial.md):
- CDEF is ~5× heavier per-block than MC on NEON (262 vs 48 ns)
- NEON ~5× per-core advantage on MC → QPU likely ~25× behind on CDEF
- R₅ isolation estimate: 0.02-0.05 (deep RED)
Issue 003 V1/V2 NEON-fallback proxy showed that a 4th NEON core running CDEF adds 1.7 Mblock/s of CDEF helper without crushing the other 3 cores. Real QPU CDEF is predicted at ~0.2 Mblock/s (an order of magnitude below the NEON-fallback proxy).
Phase 4 plan rationale: even predicted RED, build the QPU CDEF kernel because:
- Confirms or refutes the R₅ 0.02-0.05 prediction with real data
- Completes the cycle 5 record (Phases 1-7 all closed)
- Provides the QPU CDEF dispatch path needed for the V4L2 wrapper to exist (Phase 8), even if scheduler doesn't enqueue it by default
Expected Phase 4 effort: 2-3 hours given the kernel shape is similar to cycle 2/4 LPF (per-block stencil with table lookups for directions; primary + secondary tap accumulation).