marfrit/marfrit-packages
0
0
Fork 1
Code Issues 2 Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

mesa-panvk-bifrost-video: regenerate 0005 patch from POST-review snapshot #84

Merged
marfrit merged 1 commits from claude-noether/marfrit-packages:noether/mesa-panvk-bifrost-video-retrigger into main 2026-05-22 08:20:34 +00:00
Conversation 0 Commits 1 Files Changed 1
+122 -35
marfrit commented 2026-05-22 08:20:24 +00:00
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

The original 0005 patch was generated from the pre-Phase-5-review source
snapshot (phase5_review_input_2026-05-21.tgz), missing the four
load-bearing review fixes that landed in the post-review snapshot:

  • probe_hantro gate on KHR_video_* extension advertisement
  • per-session ts_counter (was process-global static)
  • panvk_v4l2_session_finish full unwind (munmap + STREAMOFF + REQBUFS=0)
  • MIN2(rb.count, 18) clamp on num_*_buffers

Run #162 (job 17032) failed in prepare() because the PKGBUILD sanity
check 'grep -q "KHR_video_queue = PAN_ARCH < 9 && panvk_v4l2_probe_hantro()"'
didn't match the actual patched output (which still had the pre-review
'KHR_video_queue = PAN_ARCH < 9,').

This patch (regenerated from phase5_post_review_2026-05-21.tgz) carries
all four review fixes. Validated locally: vanilla mesa-26.0.6 + r1..r4 +
this patch reproduces prepare()-OK byte-for-byte.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 noreply@anthropic.com

The original 0005 patch was generated from the pre-Phase-5-review source snapshot (phase5_review_input_2026-05-21.tgz), missing the four load-bearing review fixes that landed in the post-review snapshot: - probe_hantro gate on KHR_video_* extension advertisement - per-session ts_counter (was process-global static) - panvk_v4l2_session_finish full unwind (munmap + STREAMOFF + REQBUFS=0) - MIN2(rb.count, 18) clamp on num_*_buffers Run #162 (job 17032) failed in prepare() because the PKGBUILD sanity check 'grep -q "KHR_video_queue = PAN_ARCH < 9 && panvk_v4l2_probe_hantro()"' didn't match the actual patched output (which still had the pre-review 'KHR_video_queue = PAN_ARCH < 9,'). This patch (regenerated from phase5_post_review_2026-05-21.tgz) carries all four review fixes. Validated locally: vanilla mesa-26.0.6 + r1..r4 + this patch reproduces prepare()-OK byte-for-byte. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
marfrit added 1 commit 2026-05-22 08:20:24 +00:00
mesa-panvk-bifrost-video: regenerate 0005 patch from POST-review snapshot 7ecbcb3c1b 
The original 0005 patch was generated from the pre-Phase-5-review source
snapshot (phase5_review_input_2026-05-21.tgz), missing the four
load-bearing review fixes that landed in the post-review snapshot:
  - probe_hantro gate on KHR_video_* extension advertisement
  - per-session ts_counter (was process-global static)
  - panvk_v4l2_session_finish full unwind (munmap + STREAMOFF + REQBUFS=0)
  - MIN2(rb.count, 18) clamp on num_*_buffers

Run #162 (job 17032) failed in prepare() because the PKGBUILD sanity
check 'grep -q "KHR_video_queue = PAN_ARCH < 9 && panvk_v4l2_probe_hantro()"'
didn't match the actual patched output (which still had the pre-review
'KHR_video_queue = PAN_ARCH < 9,').

This patch (regenerated from phase5_post_review_2026-05-21.tgz) carries
all four review fixes. Validated locally: vanilla mesa-26.0.6 + r1..r4 +
this patch reproduces prepare()-OK byte-for-byte.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
marfrit merged commit db9ae16da9 into main 2026-05-22 08:20:34 +00:00
marfrit deleted branch noether/mesa-panvk-bifrost-video-retrigger 2026-05-22 08:20:35 +00:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
Reviewers
No Reviewers
Labels
No items
No Label
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
marfrit (Markus Fritsche)
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: marfrit/marfrit-packages#84
Delete Branch "claude-noether/marfrit-packages:noether/mesa-panvk-bifrost-video-retrigger"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?