Meta-iter1 was a scoping iteration — deliverable is the campaign
umbrella + sub-iter ledger, not a code change. Phases 2-8 are
either rolled into Phase 0+1 (situation, plan) or deliberately N/A
(no meta-level measurements or verification beyond 'issues filed +
ledger exists').
Phase 5 review is the documented deviation from 'reviews are never
skippable': justified because Phase 0's prior-art survey +
verification against kernel source IS the review-equivalent rigor
(per feedback_review_empirical_over_theoretical), and there's no
separate Phase 4 plan to review beyond the ledger. iter2 + iter3
each get a full Phase 5 review on their own.
No new memory entry — lessons fall under existing
feedback_dev_process (Phase 1 loopback when scoping was wrong) and
feedback_characterize_before_change (meta-iter1 = scope + ledger
extends naturally).
Next: start iter2 Phase 0 (HEVC backend extension via
V4L2_CID_STATELESS_HEVC_EXT_SPS_ST_RPS / _LT_RPS).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
