373f63a910
Phase 6 deliverable: v3d_h264deblock.comp (132 inst, 4 threads,
no spills). Phase 5 REDs applied:
RED-1: explicit clamp p1'/q1' to [0,255] before uint8 write
RED-2: bench-enforced m.x >= 4*stride contract
M1: 3-way 4096/4096 bit-exact (QPU vs C ref AND vs NEON).
M2: 5.629 Medge/s isolation → R8 = 0.061 RED (predicted 0.09-0.14).
Lower than prediction; H.264 deblock has 4 early-return paths +
2 conditional writes that hurt V3D branchy execution more than
expected.
M4 same-kernel: NEON-3+QPU 12.81 Medge/s ≈ pure-NEON-4 ~12-15
(neutral).
M4 MIXED (real H.264 deployment shape): CPU=MC + QPU=h264deblock
gives CPU MC 25.11 Mblock/s + QPU h264deblock 6.23 Medge/s.
QPU contribution is essentially unchanged from isolation —
the cross-substrate contention is gentle (consistent with
Issue 003's V4 finding).
Verdict: H.264 deblock = opportunistic QPU helper. Same recipe
slot as cycle 5 CDEF. 6 Medge/s helper = 85% of single-NEON-core
deblock capacity, available when CPU is busy with other work.
Cycles 1-8 deployment recipe complete:
Primary QPU: cycles 1+2+4 (VP9 IDCT/LPF, all bandwidth-bound)
Primary CPU: cycles 3+6+7 (compute-heavy or trivially fast on NEON)
Opportunistic helper: cycles 5+8 (CDEF, H.264 deblock)
Phase 9 lessons added:
- Branchy kernels underperform V3D vs straight-line ones
- Mixed-kernel helper value scales with isolation M2, not
same-kernel M4
- R prediction needs branchiness weight, not just compute density
- src/v3d_h264deblock.comp (132 inst QPU shader)
- tests/bench_v3d_h264deblock.c (3-way M1 + M2 + R classification)
- tests/bench_concurrent_mixed.c extended with K_H264DEBLOCK
- CMakeLists.txt: v3d_h264deblock.spv + bench_v3d_h264deblock
+ h264dsp linked into bench_concurrent_mixed
- docs/k8_h264deblock_phase7.md (full closure with cycles 1-8 recipe)
Next: Phase 8 — V4L2 wrapper / deployment infra. Public API
already exposes recipe-default substrate per kernel.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>